This proverb expresses a traditional disdain for wordplay, suggesting that clever manipulation of language is akin to petty theft. It implies that those who engage in such verbal acrobatics are untrustworthy, potentially using their wit to deceive or manipulate for personal gain. An example might be a merchant using ambiguous language to inflate prices or misrepresent the quality of their goods.
The adage provides insight into historical attitudes toward language and rhetoric. While wit and eloquence were often valued, there was also suspicion of those who might use these skills for less noble purposes. This sentiment likely reflects a broader cultural anxiety about deception and the potential for language to be used as a tool of manipulation. Understanding this historical context helps illuminate the underlying anxieties about persuasive language, particularly in contexts where trust is paramount. This proverb also offers a lens through which to examine the ongoing debate about the ethics of persuasion and the responsible use of rhetoric.
