The assassination of President John F. Kennedy remains a pivotal event in American history, continuously generating debate and speculation. While the Warren Commission concluded that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone, alternative theories persist, some implicating figures like Lyndon B. Johnson. These theories often center on alleged motives related to political power, the Vietnam War, or personal vendettas. They typically involve complex scenarios and often point to perceived inconsistencies in the official narrative.
Examining these alternative theories, even if ultimately deemed unsubstantiated, offers valuable insights into the complexities of historical interpretation and the enduring public fascination with this tragic event. Understanding the various perspectives surrounding the assassination is crucial for comprehending the social and political climate of the 1960s and its lasting impact on American society. Furthermore, exploring these narratives reveals the challenges inherent in reconstructing historical events and the limitations of relying solely on official accounts.
